Parallel Workshops
There are constraints of contemporary correctional partnerships in managing the growing complexity of justice-involved youth, particularly those with varied neurocognitive characteristics. Although current systems prioritize multi-agency collaboration – bringing together legal, social and mental health services, yet outcomes remain inconsistent. These limitations are not solely structural but primarily cognitive, as many interventions do not correspond with how individuals interpret information or engage with justice processes, specifically those within neurodivergence profiles.
Introducing Neuro-Desistance Alignment Model (Neuro-DAM), the discussion proposes that effectiveness depends on how well interventions with an individual’s neurocognitive processing style. Conducted to 78 individuals between the age of 14 to 21 within neurodivergence spectrum, Cognitive Justice Congruence (CJC) becomes focal of this framework, referring to how accessible and meaningful correctional processes are for participants. When congruence is low individuals may disengage or display pseudo-desistance, where outward compliance masks a lack of genuine internal change. This discourse further underscores that prevailing partnership models are grounded in standardized cognitive assumptions, which may inadvertently exclude neurodivergent youth. It advocates moving beyond system coordination toward cognitive alignment by promoting neurodiversity-informed approaches, flexible interventions strategies, and redefined measures of success. Ultimately, sustainable outcomes require partnerships that are aligned not only structural, but cognitively as well.