The Unique Needs and Strengths of Justice-Involved Women and Girls: Supervision and Intervention Strategies to Improve Their Outcome (PID077)

10am – 10.30am GMT, 27 October 2026 ‐ 30 mins

Room: Meeting Room 3A (Level 3)

Parallel Workshops

Women are not men. Men are not women. Despite 40 years of research supporting gender-responsive correctional strategies, most agencies still rely on the same policies, assessments, and supervision strategies for women and men. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks a basic fact: girls and women are, on average, far less likely to be violent, and their pathways into the justice system are often different. Many have experienced significant trauma, unstable relationships, caregiving pressures, and health challenges that shape both their risks and their strengths.

When we supervise women and girls using tools and interventions designed for men and boys, we miss key drivers of behavior. This can weaken engagement, misclassify risk, and apply the wrong level or type of intervention, undermining both success for clients and public safety. The evidence is clear: applying the risk principle means matching supervision and services to how risk actually presents for women and girls, not assuming it looks the same as it does for men and boys.

Over nearly four decades, research on female-responsive and trauma-informed approaches has shown consistent results. When systems start with the realities of girls’ and women’s lives, they see stronger client engagement, higher reductions in recidivism, and better health and family outcomes. Gender-responsive supervision is not about treating women “easier”—it is about supervising them more effectively. By aligning policies, assessments, and interventions with the evidence, agencies can improve outcomes for women and girls while strengthening community safety.