A Critical Analysis of the Bangkok Rules: Examining Implementation Gaps for Justice-Impacted Women in the U.S. (2010-2024) (PID039)

12pm – 12.30pm EST, 19 February 2025 ‐ 30 mins

Parallel Workshops

The Bangkok Rules, adopted by the United Nations in 2010, sought to revolutionize how incarcerated women are treated by addressing their unique needs and safeguarding their dignity. However, in the United States, the rules remain largely aspirational, as implementation failures persist. This analysis explores the wide gaps between policy and reality, focusing on the author’s firsthand experience of serving a 78-month federal sentence while pregnant. Deprived of basic necessities like clean water, proper clothing, and prenatal care, she was shackled, leading to a tragic miscarriage—just one of many examples of how the system fails justice-impacted women.

Despite legislative victories in 23 states that aim to improve conditions for incarcerated women, the reality remains grim. A lack of data collection, oversight, and standardization prevents meaningful progress. Without clear metrics, there is no way to measure compliance with the Bangkok Rules, leaving gaps in care unaddressed. Moreover, the absence of accountability mechanisms allows correctional facilities to continue violating women’s rights with little consequence.

What makes the case for change even more urgent is the sidelining of directly impacted women in shaping policy. Without their voices at the forefront, policies are often poorly informed, leading to selective or incomplete implementation of the Bangkok Rules. This summary calls for stronger accountability, robust data tracking, and the active involvement of justice-impacted women in decision-making to ensure that the Bangkok Rules are fully and effectively enforced, protecting the rights and dignity of incarcerated women across the U.S..