ID: ACJ20-A018 27 Jan 2026
by Victoria Knight, Stuart Ross

Advancing Corrections Journal - Edition #20 - Scholarly Reflections on Core Considerations for Correctional Practice | Article 18 (ACJ20-A018)

Article 18: Beyond Efficiency: Public Value Maximisation and the Ethics of Digital Rehabilitation (ACJ20-A018) by Victoria Knight & Stuart Ross

 
Abstract
This article is a culmination of our scholarship and engagements that intersects with practitioners and policy makers from across the world. Our recent work with the United Nations’ Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) culminated in a report focusing on digital rehabilitation (UNICRI, 2024). We evaluated current practice and policy that focused on the intersection of rehabilitation and digital. Fundamental to this were important rights-focused and ethical principles to ensure digital creates no harm and is a key tool to adapt, enhance, and transform rehabilitation and human flourishing. The goal of the report was to provide practical advice and guidance about the ethical principles that should guide the use of digital rehabilitation in prisons, and how to plan for the development, implementation, and continuing provision of digital resources to support rehabilitation.  The digitalization of justice-led rehabilitation has been incremental and has proceeded faster in some jurisdictions and in some rehabilitation domains than in others, but it is undeniable that digital technologies are becoming a viable core element in justice-led rehabilitation. What is being created here is a form of digital public infrastructure that is part of the wider process of the digitalization of government, sometimes referred to as the e-government (Homburg, 2018). In this article we want to reflect on some of the implications of this from a public value perspective, and propose a model to ensure digital reform maximises the public value in this sector.
 
Keywords: digital rehabilitation, public value, ethics