Building Better Prisons Starts with People: Why Recruitment, Training and Retention Are the Foundations of Humane Corrections
_________________________________________________________________________________
That is the argument being advanced by the International Corrections and Prisons Association Staff Training and Development Network, an international initiative focused on strengthening correctional practice by strengthening the people who deliver it. The Network’s message is that recruiting, training, and retaining staff should be treated as a strategic priority for safe and humane corrections, not as a back office function or a compliance exercise. When those systems work, facilities are more stable, professional norms take root, and reforms have a realistic chance of being implemented. When those systems fail, the consequences ripple outward, from frontline stress and burnout to increased instability and a heightened risk of harm for everyone inside an institution.
The Network frames its work around several connected priorities. One is professionalising prison personnel across sectors including public, private, academic, and non profit partners. Another is promoting conflict responsive correctional practices, recognising that modern custodial environments are shaped by tensions that can escalate quickly without skilled intervention. A third is cultivating the leaders of tomorrow, with particular attention to the layers of supervision and middle management that shape daily culture and set practical expectations for performance. The Network also points to alignment with international norms and standards, referencing the Mandela Rules as a guiding framework for staff development and professional conduct.
A shift in emphasis: judgement, communication, dignity
Behind those priorities is a shift in emphasis. The Network argues that workforce development is not only about ensuring staff can follow procedures. It is about equipping staff to exercise judgement, communicate effectively, manage conflict, and uphold dignity under pressure. It is also about making corrections a profession with clear pathways, expectations, and sustained development, rather than a job defined primarily by staffing shortages and crisis response.
Recruitment: values-based, strategic, and competency-focused
Recruitment is the first step, and the Network describes it as one of the most persistent challenges in the field. Too often, recruitment is treated as a race to fill vacancies. The Network’s view is that this approach misses the point. Corrections needs people who can operate ethically and calmly in complex environments, and those qualities cannot be assumed. Recruitment, in the Network’s framing, should be values based and strategic. It should identify candidates whose motivations align with humane and rehabilitative outcomes, and it should test the competencies most associated with safe practice.
Widening channels and reframing the career
In practical terms, the Network highlights outreach and employer branding as a starting place. It suggests widening recruitment channels to reach candidates with transferable skills, including those from vocational programs, military and veteran pathways, and community organisations where crisis response and conflict management may already be part of the work. At the same time, it calls for reframing corrections as a career with progression, training opportunities, and social value, rather than an occupation defined by risk and public misunderstanding.
Screening for the attributes that matter
However, the Network’s recruitment message is not only about finding more applicants. It is about screening more effectively for the right attributes. It emphasises behavioural and scenario based evaluation to assess decision making under pressure, communication skills, and the capacity to de escalate. It also stresses psychological and ethical suitability, with an emphasis on emotional stability, integrity, and a demonstrable commitment to human rights. The goal, as presented, is to build a workforce that can sustain professional standards rather than drift toward cynicism, excessive force, or disengagement.
Desired qualities and values in new staff
The Network identifies several qualities and values it believes correctional systems should prioritise when bringing new staff into the profession. Ethical integrity and a human rights consciousness sit at the centre. In daily custodial practice, staff are the ones who translate rules into lived reality, and the difference between fair, proportionate authority and arbitrary power can shape everything from compliance to violence risk. Emotional intelligence and communication ability are also highlighted, reflecting an emphasis on relational competence as a safety tool. Flexibility and crisis resilience matter because modern corrections is rarely predictable. People in custody may be experiencing acute mental distress, conflict dynamics can change rapidly, and staff routinely confront situations that cannot be resolved through procedure alone.
The Network also stresses dedication to rehabilitation as a meaningful screening factor. Staff attitudes influence program engagement and daily culture, and a workforce that does not believe change is possible can inadvertently undermine rehabilative goals even when programs exist. Cultural sensitivity and bias recognition round out the list, reflecting the reality that custodial settings are diverse environments where fairness and safety depend on staff being able to recognise vulnerability, avoid discriminatory assumptions, and communicate effectively across difference.
Onboarding and mentorship to reduce early attrition
Recruitment, in this view, cannot succeed without proper onboarding. The Network describes organised onboarding and mentorship as part of recruitment’s promise to candidates. Pre service training academies and peer support initiatives are presented as practical methods to reduce early attrition, build confidence, and prevent new staff from being left to learn under stress through trial and error.
Training: from compliance to professional development
If recruitment sets the direction, training determines whether a workforce can perform at the level modern corrections requires. Here the Network argues for a clear break with older models that focus on basic procedure and compliance. It champions the idea that twenty first century prison officer training must move toward genuine specialisation and professional development. The shift, it says, is driven by changing challenges including mental health crises, the growing role of technology, radicalisation risks, and increasingly complex custodial populations.
Three characteristics of modern training
In practice, the Network describes three training characteristics that should become standard. The first is scenario based and adaptive learning. Instead of relying primarily on passive lecture formats, staff should train in simulated environments that allow them to practise de escalation, crisis negotiation, and ethical decision making under pressure. This approach treats training as preparation for real conditions rather than as a test of memorisation.
The second characteristic is continuous professional development. The Network argues against one off certification models and for structured career long learning, including micro credentials in specialist areas such as trauma informed care or gang management. The emphasis is that competence is not static, and systems should treat learning as ongoing rather than as a threshold crossed once at the start of employment.
The third characteristic is data driven and evidence based practice. The Network advocates training grounded in what is known to reduce harm and improve outcomes, rather than in tradition or anecdote. It points to approaches such as desistance informed practice and the use of structured methods for engaging people who are resistant or distressed. In this framing, evidence based training is not an academic preference. It is a way to ensure that limited training resources produce measurable improvements in safety and effectiveness.
Priority specialist areas
Alongside these broad shifts, the Network identifies critical specialist training areas it sees as most urgent. Dynamic security and conflict resolution is one. It stresses procedural justice, transparent rule application, and nonviolent communication, positioning dialogue and relationship building as operational tools. Mental health and crisis intervention is another, reflecting the prevalence of trauma, self harm risk, and acute distress in custodial settings. Training here is described as needing to go beyond awareness toward practical intervention skills that help staff respond safely and humanely.
Rehabilitation focused practice is presented as a further priority. The Network points to skills such as motivational interviewing and restorative approaches as tools staff can use to support engagement and reduce resistance.
Digital literacy and cybersecurity also appear as emerging needs, linked to evolving contraband methods and digital enabled crime. Finally, leadership and change management is framed as essential because reforms do not implement themselves. Correctional leaders at multiple levels need the ability to guide teams, anticipate resistance, and sustain staff wellbeing while maintaining standards.
Retention, wellbeing, and institutional stability
Staff wellbeing and retention are treated not as separate topics but as inseparable from safety and quality. The Network’s approach connects support, resilience, and humane outcomes, arguing that staff who are overworked, undervalued, or traumatised cannot sustain rehabilitative goals. In this view, burnout is not only a personal issue. It becomes an institutional risk. It can reduce empathy, weaken communication, increase the likelihood of dehumanisation, and contribute to the kinds of escalation that lead to injury and instability.
High turnover, the Network argues, destabilises prisons by breaking continuity and institutional knowledge. When experienced staff leave, new staff must fill the gaps quickly, often without enough support, and a cycle of stress and attrition can deepen. That instability can undermine trust and consistency, which are central to safe daily operations. As a result, the Network frames wellbeing as a system wide safety issue. Support mechanisms, peer programs, career pathways, and credible leadership are all presented as practical components of humane corrections, not optional benefits.
Looking ahead: adapting to new challenges
Looking ahead, the Network describes a correctional landscape changing rapidly, driven by technology, mental health and neurodiversity needs, extremism and radicalisation risks, and shifting population demographics. It argues that training must keep pace through adaptive curricula that can be updated modularly rather than overhauled infrequently. Scenario based and immersive training is presented as a way to prepare staff for high stakes situations. Cross disciplinary and multi agency training is another, aiming to reduce silos by bringing corrections staff into shared learning with mental health professionals and other specialists. Continuous upskilling, supported through annual development expectations and credentialing systems, is also highlighted as a mechanism to keep skills current.
Why investment matters
For leaders and policymakers who continue to view staff training as a compliance requirement, the Network emphasises the strategic value of serious investment. Underinvesting in workforce development, it argues, is not merely a budgeting choice. It can escalate violence and chaos, undermine rehabilitation efforts, increase turnover costs, and amplify legal and reputational risks. Conversely, strategic workforce development can function as a force multiplier. Well trained staff can prevent incidents through communication and de escalation, reduce the likelihood of rights violations, and sustain the institutional stability needed for long term improvement.
The Network’s underlying message is that corrections systems cannot reach safer and more humane outcomes through policy statements alone. They need a capable workforce supported by professional standards, specialist training, and credible pathways that make people want to stay. Recruitment is the start, training is the engine, retention is the stabiliser, and wellbeing is the foundation. Treated together, they form the infrastructure of humane corrections. Treated as separate, or treated as secondary, they become the weak point where systems fracture under pressure.
